One of the most visible bribery scams in America, made famous by Bill & Hillary Clinton, is to be paid “speaking fees” by special interests directly affected by the action & power of the bribee. In an honest world, who the f**k is going to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for ANY person to give a speech? Could there be any more obvious quid-pro-quo payoffs? I wonder when Biden will establish a charitable foundation and some GoFundMe accounts to launder the rest of the bribes to his incoming administration?
Everyone knows there a ton of fake new stories that get passed around the Internet. Most of them are designed to smear or perpetuate myths about political opponents. However, be aware of a common leftist tactic to plant fake stories to create false equivalencies and destroy the credibility of true stories. For example, the long history of mysterious deaths surrounding the Clinton’s is well-known and documented. But littered through these stories are a few fake, easily-disproven death rumors. So, when someone mention the Clinton associate death history, Democrats only need point out a few of the fake stories, which destroys the credibility of the whole storyline. Also, a ton of obviously fake stories have been planted about mysterious deaths surrounding Donald Trump. So, when prominent Democratic donor & Clinton friend, Jeffrey Epstein, dies in perhaps the most obvious fake suicide in American history, Twitter had both trending #ClintonBodyCount and #TrumpBodyCount tweets. The neutral observer hears about both and concludes all are fake news conspiracy theories. Anyone paying attention knows Epstein was an uber-liberal connected to many powerful Democrats, with Bill Clinton visiting his “Lolita Island” 26 times. The Clinton’s, above anyone else, have the history and motive to have him killed. Yet, the media largely have ignored these connections and instead played up a couple harmless 20-30 year old pictures and Trump quotes with Epstein. It is hilarious to watch the media express outrage at the “conspiracy theories” about Epstein’s murder backed by “no evidence” after 3 years of Trump-Russia stories received 24-7 coverage despite any evidence. Always trust your common sense over anything you hear in today’s American media.
I wonder when Mueller came to a semi-definitive conclusion there was no evidence of collusion or obstruction? How far into an investigation that encompassed 500 witnesses, 2800 subpoenas, and 500 search warrants did he figure this out? Was it really necessary to go that deep when it was pretty obvious along the way it was all a politically-motivated witch hunt? Did Mueller purposely withhold the results until after the midterm elections? I’m sure he could have given a preliminary report even if he was still investigating. And for all these celebrities and mainstream media commentators whining that Attorney General Barr may not be objective, did any of you ever raise ONE SINGLE OBJECTION to Obama’s lackeys, Attorney Generals Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch, who ignored or actively covered up dozens of Hillary and Barack scandals (Fast & Furious, IRS conservative targeting, Clinton email server & ignoring of subpoenas, Solyndra, Benghazi, Clinton Foundation, and on and on)?