American political parties collect BILLIONS of dollars every campaign. Add to that billions put into election interference from Russia, China, and other enemies of the country. What do you think is more effective–a few robocalls & TV ads? Or is it easier to get the results they want by spending on I.T. pros to spread fake info on the web, stock/bond transactions to manipulate financial market stability, “protesters” to create the perception of chaos, “journalist” bribes to spread fear & hysteria, opposition research firms to dig up every ounce of dirt on opponents, and so on? There are no election year coincidences, and 2020 is no exception. This is all engineered by despicable people who care far more about holding power than the fate of everyday Americans.
Pay attention to the wording used by mainstream media outlets when covering a story. Almost always, the reporters use the exact same words to cover the narrative of the day. For example, when the U.S. passed 100,000 deaths according to CDC totals, EVERY mainstream media outlet–NY Times, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, Wash Post, ABC, etc.–said the country passed a “grim milestone today.” Now, the U.S. is facing a “spike in cases” of covid. Reporters thinking independently could use an infinite number of phrases to cover the story: “increase in cases”, “faster rate of corona cases”, “reversal in growth rate”, etc. However, the stories are covered almost word-for-word the same way. What does that tell you? Are media reporters independently stumbling on the same stories, or are they just reciting whatever brainwashing instructions have been given to them for the day?
If you need any more evidence the mainstream media is utterly corrupt, biased, and downright despicable, you only need look at their coverage of Hydroxychloroquine in comparison to Remdesivir and in-process vaccines for treatment of Covid-19. Remdesivir is an anti-viral drug made by Gilead that shows promise. Results have been mixed, but it’s still in it’s early stages. There are at least a dozen potential vaccines in process by various companies, but not much information has been made available. Remdesivir and potential vaccines have been super-hyped by the media, so much so that they’ve driven the stock market back up almost to where they were before the crisis, even though we have no idea when they’ll be ready, how effective they are, or what side effects may occur. Conversely, Hydroxychloroquine has been on the market for half a century, mostly used for malaria. It’s possible side effects are well-known, and if it was even 1% as dangerous as the media is hyping, then 50 million prescriptions wouldn’t have been written and the maker likely would have been sued out of existence. True, the effectiveness for Covid-19 is still up for debate, but the media “danger” warnings are flat-out insane! They have said virtually nothing about possible dangers of other potential solutions. So, why the difference?
Hydroxychloroquine is ready for use now. If it works well, it will sabotage the stay-at-home-until-election narrative they’ve been pushing to tank the economy.
Hydroxychloroquine is off patent and cheap. There’s no real money to be made by Pharma companies.
Mostly importantly, it’s a way to ridicule Trump, and it is absolutely unacceptable that he be proven right!
Big Tech companies have joined in the suppression of information, as they won’t allow posts or videos of doctors explaining the drug’s effectiveness. The media danger hype has also made it tougher to get subjects to take part in scientific studies. In any case, this is further evidence that the mainstream media and Big Tech censors are truly despicable people and a danger to the health of the nation!