06-07 Politically Incorrect Daily




Political Memes and Funny Pictures

asking burger how cooked grill make same anyway
lost america quit smoking marlboro started vaping strawberry cheesecake
doctor walk fitbit gas station
democrats polls off cliff biden cnn loves you
joe biden democrats you are not a puppet
breaking bad big pharma boosters done when i say were done
biden democrats ship statue karl marx
gun control wolf sheep remove teeth
graph gas prices trump biden obama
iran uranium enrichment green energy program un
meanwhile at amazon more than 2 genders fit type men women
babylon bee gavin newsome covid all servants masked

Social Media Posts of the Day

tweet dad son monster room after you
tweet wife sad showed boobs doesnt work same
tweet cheerios fetch kid why didnt think
tweet cringy moments embarrassing others remember

Message of the Day

message change wont come if we wait for others we are change we seek

Lower Taxes on China, Raise Taxes on Americans

Biden Lifting Some China Tariffs to Fight Inflation

Wow, taxes increase prices to consumers?!!! What a concept! Remember that Biden’s “Build Back Better” plan has NOT backed off on any tax increases for American companies, but he’ll gladly ease up on his communist buddies. Note: EVERY American tariff still in place is a retaliatory measure to counter a tariff or unfair trade practice in the target country. So Biden will effectively take us back to the pre-Trump era where China had free rein with screwing us over. And by making it tougher for American companies to compete, it only INCREASES our dependence on China. Newsflash: much of the supply chain clusterfuck around the world is a direct result of China’s brutal, inefficient “Zero Covid” policies.

joe biden cap make china great again
yellen only taxing wealthy people inflation rate be you soon
why are we so reliant on china for supply chain 3 guesses bush clinton obama

Next Front in the War Against Freedom: Red Flag Laws

For those of you who don’t know what red flag laws are, the idea is that we stop mass shooters by taking away guns from people who exhibit the “red flags” of mental disease or the potential to be a murderer. As with the removal of “misinformation” and “hate speech,” red flag laws sound good on the surface, but they too suffer from the same flaw — who decides and what qualifies? They’re simply another way to remove Constitutional rights from anyone who may threaten Ruling Class power. The list of possible justifications are endless. For example:

  • You attempted suicide decades ago as a teenager.
  • You were within blocks of the Capitol during the January 6th riot.
  • You’ve been accused (but not charged with) domestic violence by a vindictive ex.
  • Your accounts have been suspended by Twitter or Facebook.
  • Someone (such as an FBI agent) hacked into your social media account and posted a threat.
  • You’ve protested Covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates.
  • You donated money to the NRA or Kyle Rittenhouse defense funds.
  • You’ve liked or re-tweeted anti-government or anti-New World Order posts.
  • You refuse to surrender your AR-15 or “excessive” ammunition.
  • You’ve been charged with a crime, but the government delays the trial for years.
  • You got in a drunken bar fight years ago.
  • You have a parent or sibling who committed violent crimes; i.e. a genetic red flag.

Get the idea? Expect unelected bureaucrats to administer the laws without checks’n’balances. Don’t count on courts to protect you since you’ll lose your rights while appeals work their way through the courts, and if you eventually win your case, as with Covid, tyrannical government leaders will just modify the laws slightly to start the process all over.

how red flag laws work ex wife swat team tom jerry
future of red flag laws global warming hoax white male open borders red flag
red flag laws when group of murderers thieves congress decide who shouldnt own a gun

Quote of the Day

quote molyneaux gun control not anti gun pro centralizing government political minions

Other Links That May Interest You

Rittenhouse Lawyer Plans to Target Zuckerberg & Facebook Among 10 New Defamation Suits
This is Why the Biden Administration Is Falling Apart – Larry Kudlow
Introverts and Anti-People Meme Gallery
Immigration Meme Gallery




Social Credit Scores & ESG – What Are They and Why Are They Loved By the World Ruling Class?

imagine if you will world people dont grasp liberty basic economics decide how you live

“We have to stop the spread of ‘misinformation,’ ‘disinformation,’ and ‘fake news’ on the web.”
“We can’t allow ‘hate speech’ to proliferate on social media.”
“To prevent mass shootings & other crime, we should have ‘red flag laws’ that allow gun seizure and monitoring of individuals who show signs of mental illness & hate.”
“In a public health emergency, we can’t allow inaccurate science & medical information to spread.”
“Instead of just profits, companies should be evaluated on their social & environmental impact on society.”

All of the above statements on the surface sound good, so it’s easy to see how you can lure most of the population to support them. But they all have two things in common:

1. None of them are ever precisely defined.
2. They are suffer from one major flaw – WHO GETS TO DECIDE what these are and how they should be enforced?

For example, most people would agree racial slurs are “hate speech,” but what qualifies as a racial slur? I once heard a girl get bitched at for saying Afro-American instead of African-American. “An Afro is a hairdo!!” was the angry response. What if I described to you how a person was convicted of molesting & torturing ten children. After I told you this, you might hate that person. Does that qualify as hate speech? What if I factually described how certain politicians received political kickbacks, gave favored tax incentives to political cronies, and passed a series of laws to deprive you personally of your basic civil rights? You may experience angry feelings and want payback. Does that qualify as hate speech? What if a person with multiple Ph.D.’s published a double-blind study of 10,000 patients describing a successful over-the-counter treatment for Covid, complete with links to sources, but the remedy hadn’t yet been evaluated by the FDA or CDC. Does this qualify as “misinformation?” What if a company pays its workers more salary & benefits on average than any other in the world while consistently being surveyed as one of the best companies to work for, but the company has taken active steps to discourage unionization of its employees? Should they be praised or punished? What if a company uses all clean energy sources to power its company and donates billions to charity, but it does business with human rights violators in Russia, China, and Iran? Which should be given more weight? What if a person attempted suicide decades ago as a teenager? Should they be flagged as a person who can never own a gun?

There are endless examples of interpretation fuzziness, which is precisely why they’re all so dangerous. The imprecise definitions allow rulers to manipulate them to punish political enemies and deny them their civil rights, all in an effort to cement their power. However, they have a problem. The world population is nearing 8 billion, all with ever-increasing access to technology. Multiply that by hundreds of daily social media posts, texts, emails, and so on. You’re talking trillions of daily communications. It’s impossible to hire enough people to personally monitor or provide any kind of human reasoning analysis on any kind of large scale. It doesn’t get much easier for businesses, as there are millions of companies around the world, made up of billions of employees interacting on the job.

Enter technology. World rulers have two big advantages in this regard — 1) They can allocate massive budgets for communication-monitoring organizations like the NSA, and 2) all the Big Tech companies are loyal Leftist allies happy to do their bidding. Employees of these organizations are brainwashed to go along using all the statements at the beginning of this article. So how do they tackle this gargantuan task?

Technology can do amazing things, but everything in tech must be reduced to simple math–>numbers that can be compared and programmed using IF-THEN type logic. This is where social credit scores and ESG come in. These are both ways of assigning a number to individual citizens (social credit score) and businesses (ESG). You may have heard the term “algorithms,” which are simply subcomponents of computer programs to execute specific tasks, in this case computing the scores. What goes into the computations? Well, that’s where the fuzziness and interpretations come back in. Computers may seem smart nowadays, but at their most basic level, they’re simple electrical devices using trillions of on/off switches to execute commands. There’s really no such thing as “artificial intelligence.” Everything comes down to a massive amount of logical decisions programmed by human beings, with all their biases and flaws. So when these algorithms are controlled by governments and their Leftist Big Tech allies, it doesn’t take much to manipulate the programs for political gain.

For example:

  • Follow MSNBC on Facebook: +10
  • Subscribe to Epoch Times or Newsmax: -3
  • Like Joe Biden tweet: +1
  • Retweet a Trump quote: -1
  • Post a meme making fun of Hillary Clinton: -2
  • March in an anti-lockdown rally: -10
  • Write a post advocating natural immunity over vaccines: -10
  • Maintain a libertarian-leaning website: -500

The same kind of manipulation can be used on businesses:

  • Operate a company that forces union membership on its employees: +10
  • Run a tech company that enforces government censorship requests +500
  • Hire employees that donate 99% to Democrats over Republican candidates: +50
  • Operate a company producing cheap energy that competes with wind & solar business cronies: -100
  • Donate to BLM and transgender charities: +10
  • Have a free-speech advocating owner who uses his money to buy a social media company & reverse mass censorship: -10000

You get the idea. Tech companies already use a type of social scoring system. That’s why your harmless meme got you Facebook jail. It’s why that incendiary post advocating violence against conservatives did NOT get flagged. It’s why when you do a Google search for a political story, left-leaning sources like CNN & NY Times always come up first, while Fox News, Townhall, Daily Caller, and other right-leaning sites are buried several pages down where almost no one will see them. That score is the ultimate arbiter of justice. It’s impossible to hire enough people to read through everything and manually decide what should or shouldn’t be censored or hidden. You may have heard stories of millions of fake social media accounts or “bots.” The purpose of these programmed fake accounts is to manipulate rankings & scores, so even if some tech employees sincerely tried to program algorithms in a fair way, they still can be tainted for political purposes.

Social credit scores and ESG take what the tech companies are doing to a society level, so instead of just censoring your communication, they can implement other punishments to limit your freedom & finances. For example, we saw in the Covid trucker protests in Canada, Justin Trudeau, without legal authority, froze the finances of protesters. The same kind of tyrannical measures can be applied based on your score. Imagine not having access to any of your credit cards or bank accounts. Even if temporary and legally reversible, it could be devastating. Imagine a business not being able to open a bank account. Imagine government imposing a minimum social credit score on any employees to be hired, otherwise the business’s own ESG score would suffer. Do you think you’d be able to own a gun if your score was too low? Some of these actions may seem far-fetched, but who would have thought all the unconstitutional Covid lockdowns and mandates could ever happen?

The Ruling Class effectiveness of the scores is multiplied by the THREAT of what could happen. Self-censorship is the most prevalent and dangerous type of censorship. This is where you censor your own communication because, for example, you’re afraid of getting banned by Facebook or Twitter. Imagine what kind of fear the average person would have if it was possible to lose access to all their money. Do you think that might keep their behavior in line? It’s all about CONTROL CONTROL CONROL!

Governing organizations around the world may call these scores something different, and they certainly wouldn’t try to implement them all at once, or without some kind of “emergency” to provide them political cover. But as we’ve seen with Covid, they will keep adding power & diminishing civil rights, bit by bit, until or unless the public finally pushes back. The time is now to push back, starting with the ones implementing the early versions of the scores, the fascist Big Tech companies. It’s also time to push back again the media, celebrities, and education officials that are enabling the Ruling Class march to tyranny. As Ronald Reagan so accurately stated, freedom is always just one generation away from extinction.

slippery slope graph shadow bans fact checking ministry of truth digital id social credit scores
lesson reality of social credit system criticized government facebook account suspended
red flag laws explained same people who contact facebook offensive posts calling tip line to seize guns
daily struggle little voice post banned self censorshipdaily struggle little voice post banned self censorship
cats fire working class humans turned on each other instead of ruling class
message venn diagram 1984 animal farm brave new world matrix you are here
tweet elon musk esg tesla exxon
tweet mandate drop not good enough deconstruct technocratic totalitarian one world government
message if people stand ruling class game is over

08-08 Politically Incorrect Daily

Thoughts on “Red Flag” Laws

I’m by no means an anti-gun control fanatic. I believe if you take politics out of the discussion, there are reasonable compromises to protect gun ownership for law-abiding citizens while keeping guns out of the hands of dangerous criminals. However, there is one measure I passionately oppose — Red Flag laws. Essentially, these are laws that prevent gun ownership by those who have raised a number of “red flags” indicating they may commit deadly acts, such as violent social media posts, mental health hospitalization, and prior criminal records. On the surface these sound reasonable, but the problem is who interprets what are considered red flags? What if you were in a ballroom brawl as a stupid teenager? What if you posted on Facebook: “My husband forgot our anniversary; I’m going to kill him”, “Our borders need to be defended”, “Illegal immigrants are a threat to my family’s safety”, “The mainstream media are the enemy of the people”, “We need a new American revolution”, and so on. What if Netflix & Amazon released your viewing history to show you like murder shows? What if you’re a history buff who has read books about Hitler? The examples are endless on what could be used as justification under Red Flag laws to take guns from law-abiding Americans. Many in the media and Democratic party have labelled all Trump supporters as racists or white nationalists. Why not label all Trump voters as red flag threats? It may sound ridiculous, but who decides? More than likely unelected government agencies will enforce the laws, with challenges only available in a slow-moving legal system packed with Obama & Clinton-appointed liberal judges. Red Flag laws are the same as “hate speech” laws and Big Tech censorship, which have been stretched and twisted to essentially shutdown speech of anyone who doesn’t toe the politically-correct liberal line. Do not give Big Brother another tool to take away more Constitutional freedoms!

‘Red Flag’ Gun Control Bills Pick Up Momentum With G.O.P. in Congress

gun dominoes nfa firearm protection act red flag laws complete ban confiscation
founding fathers heres the first amendment if someone takes that away heres 2nd one

Political Memes and Funny Pictures

excuse me maam have you accepted mainstream media as your lord and savior orange man bad how to hate white people
when you bought healthy food but now craving junk only thing is kale
how minimum wage works out of work after forcing increase
mom just headache online symptom checker grave get in sponge bob
hollywood barrier to lecture on how walls are immoral
liberalism-is-all-about-control-think-eat-healthcare-say-education-bulbs
wife doesnt like me calling her ex girlfriend as if not 100 percent factually accurate
david hogg there i was buying tampons at walmart in el paso
news says guns kill people waiting for them to move
zombie looking for brains walks by beto orourke

The True Cause of Division in America

quote who all besides me thinks the media is responsible for promoting racial violence

Quote of the Day

quote samual jackson i dont think its gun control about people who arent taught value of life

Tweets of the Day

tweet john burk shooter was registered color religion if you ask these questions youre the problem
tweet d souza left accuses someone of racism false accusation

Other Links That May Interest You

New York Times Changes Accurate Headline to Please Democrats
Former Google Engineer Says Google Will Try to Prevent Trump’s Reelection
Gun Control Meme Gallery
Mainstream Media Meme Gallery